A 10-YEAR-OLD Shannon girl is in line for a court-approved compensation pay-out of €32,500 after “a bad ol’ day at the bouncy castle”, a court has heard.
At Ennis Circuit Court, Judge Francis Comerford made the comment after getting a close up of the residual scarring to Ayat Farhan from her two surgeries after a fall from a bouncy castle on the grounds of St Conaire’s National School in Shannon five years ago, when Ayat was aged five.
Accompanied by her father, Farhad Jabed, to the judge’s bench at Ennis Circuit Court, Judge Comerford re-assured Ayat when he told her: “I wouldn’t notice the scars if I met you. I wouldn’t worry about it myself.”
Judge Comerford told the 10-year old that “it was a bad ol’ day at the bouncy castle and how are you now?”
Judge Comeford said that he is “generally positive” to the recommendation of a pay-out of €32,500 to Ayat, but requires one more medical report on the question as to whether she may require a further surgical correction to her arm that was injured before making a final decision.
In the case, Ayat Farhan, through her father Farhad Jabed, is suing the Board of Management of St Conaire’s National School, in Shannon, Fittest Superstars Ltd, and Alan’s Bouncy Castles Ltd for personal injury damages.
Counsel for Ayat, Elaine Power BL, told Judge Comerford that she was recommending an offer of €32,500 from the other side to the court.
Ms Power said that, as a result of the fall, Ayat sustained a fracture to her distal humerus – or a broken elbow, adding that, after the bouncy castle accident, the young girl was admitted to hospital where she first required a procedure to use wiring to stabilise the fracture.
Ms Power said that liability is an issue in the case and that is why she is recommending the “reasonable offer” of €32,500.
Outlining the background to the injury, Ms Power said that her client’s case is that Ayat was caused to fall onto a hard concrete and tarmacadam surface adjacent to the bouncy castle on June 22, 2019, at the school premises.
Ms Power said that the case is pleaded on the basis of “negligence through the way the bouncy castle was set up so as to permit a child to fall from it onto a hard surface”.
Ms Power also claimed that there was a failure by the defendants to adequately supervise the bouncy castle and a failure to prevent footwear that was taken off by children at the entrance to the bouncy castle from accumulating.
On the dispute around liability, Ms Power said that “there is a difference between the parties as to where the bouncy castle was placed on the day in question”.
Ms Power said that her client’s case is that the bouncy castle was quite close to the hard surface and the defendant says further away, closer to a fence on a grass area.
Ms Power said that her client’s difficulty in proving liability is two-fold.
“Because of photos taken on the day of the accident, and based on certain engineering inspection, it is difficult to see how a child of her size could have fallen a sufficient distance from the bouncy castle to land on a hard surface – that is the major issue between the two parties,” she said
Ms Power said that her client has been put on full proof of her claim and her own engineer has adverted to the difficulty in her own case.
Judge Comerford adjourned the case to January for the medical report to be provided for court. Any payout will be held in trust for Ayat Farhan until she turns 18.
