Limerick Councillor’s motion to lodge four page submission to EPA is passed

Cllr James Collins

Limerick City & County Council unanimously passed Cllr James Collinsโ€™ motion to lodge a four-page formal submission to the Environmental Protection Agency objecting to Irish Cementโ€™s licence application to begin industrial incineration at its Mungret plant.

The EPA is currently considering Irish Cementโ€™s licence application and must now consider a formal, unanimous objection by Limerick councillors, before issuing its decision after the September deadline.

Cllr Collins gathered the full support of his fellow councillors in a move which pits them against the Executive of Limerick Council, which had controversially approved the incineration proposals at the initial planning stage.

Cllr Collinsโ€™ motion warns of the potential public health dangers posed by incineration.ย โ€œThe potential adverse impact on public health of incineration of toxicย substances in our community cannot be accurately assessed. The detrimentalย effects of toxic waste incineration on public health are not and will not beย measured or monitored. The risk to this generationโ€™s health and that of future generations is unknown.”

โ€œWe are concerned that the HSE, by its own admission, does not have theย expertise to assess the risk of industrial incineration on public health. It does not have the data or the resources to understand or investigate the clusters ofย cancer and pulmonary ailments that have been described in the vicinity of theย plant over many decades, even using existing raw materials and fuels.

Advertisement

Sign up for the weekly Limerick Post newsletter


โ€œIrish Cement insist that their intended process for incinerating waste is โ€˜safeโ€™.ย They have repeatedly stated: there are no health risks, even before An Bord Pleanalaย (ABP) disallowed a significant amount of substances, included in theย original application coded list of 117, as hazardous materials. Supporting thisย position, An Bord Pleanรกla (ABP) assured the people of Limerick that burningย industrial waste โ€˜would not be prejudicial to public healthโ€™.

โ€œBut by what authority can ABP make such an emphatic assurance? How doย they know? What process of deduction allows them to give this guarantee?

Where is the data supporting such an unfaltering position?โ€
โ€œThe Cement Plant in Mungret is currently before the courts due to poor environmental performance and fugitive dust emissions. This prosecution was due to public pressure, and publicly funded laboratory tests, not through routine enforcement by the EPA.
โ€œThe recent advent of deeper research into air quality has shown that very small nanoparticles and particulate matter (PM2.5 and lower) can be the mostย damaging to inhale, and often escapes filtration and monitoring. Research intoย air quality is entering a new phase, but regulation has yet to catch up. Inย Ireland, monitoring has yet to catch up.

โ€œPoor air quality is now related to infertility, mental health, and increasingly is a factor in determining property values.

โ€œWhat the Mid-West is faced with in this current standoff between concernedย citizens of Limerick versus Irish Cement is a governance gap. In a recentย question to the Dรกil, Niall Collins T.D. asked what action โ€˜the HSE will take toย measure and manage the increased health risks to the population in theย vicinity of the planned incinerator.โ€

A reply was referred by Minister of Healthย to Dr. Kevin Kelleher, Assistant National Director โ€“ Public Health/Childcareย Strategic Planning and Transformation.

Dr. Kelleherโ€™s response, dated 9 May 2018, set down the shortfalls andย insufficiencies of the HSE in protecting the public. In several ways, this position was a climbdown from the emphatic confidence of the HSE Environmental Officers who had rubber stamped Irish Cementโ€™s Environmental Impact Statement back in June 2016. In their submission report, they admitted that โ€˜no risk assessment for Tolerable Daily Intake of dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs has been undertakenโ€™. In other words, they have no idea if our daily dose of dioxins will impact our wellbeing?โ€

โ€œIf Dr. Kelleherโ€™s statement demonstrated that there has been no assessment ofย the health hazard to date, it revealed too that the HSE are not obliged toย monitor future risk. He stated: โ€˜There is no environmental or planningย legislation which obliges the HSE to assess and undertake the ongoing long-term monitoring of a potential risk to human health from a particular site-ย specific development following the granting of planning permission.โ€™

โ€œBy their own admission, the HSE only responds to acute enquiries/concerns about health issues in a community as they arise, e.g. dust blows. Currently in Ireland, routine surveillance of disease is limited to that of infectious disease and on a delayed time scale, Cancer and Suicide. So, when Irish Cement, ABP or the HSE assure the people of Limerick that there is nothing โ€˜prejudicial to public healthโ€™, we must be wary. After all, they are not making this claim on a disease registry or context-specific research: there has been no independent collection of data and no one else knows any better.

How can we know the effects on public health if there is no specific baselineย data to refer back to?โ€ Mr. Collins concluded.

More about politics here.

Advertisement