Failed heist lands two men in prison

TWO men have been found guilty of theft at Limerick District Court after their planned โ€œheistโ€ at a Limerick city off-licence fell foul of a garda investigation.

26-year-old Ger Oโ€™Dwyer with an address at Brookville Avenue, Clareview, Limerick and co-accused, 43-year-old Frank Mostrodonato of Lord Edward Street in Limerick city were put on election by judge Tom Oโ€™Donnell for the indictable charges before the court.

Outlining the facts in the case, Inspector Brendan McDonnagh of Roxboro Road Garda Station told the court that on September 27 last, Mr Mostrodonato made a statement to gardai alleging that he was taken from his bed at gunpoint at 12.45am on the night in question and forced to go to the Fine Wines Off-licence on the Childers Road where he was manager.

Advertisement

Sign up for the weekly Limerick Post newsletter




The statement went on to say that Mr Mostrodonato was forced, at gun point by his lone assailant, to open the store, turn off the alarm and empty the safe of its contents.

Inspector McDonnagh told the court that the amount in question was โ‚ฌ5,100 but after garda investigations were carried out, it was found to be a hoax, in the guise of a robbery.

Gardai, the court heard, arrested Frank Mostrodonato and his accomplice and alleged gunman, Ger Oโ€™Dwyer, where both were charged with the theft and Mr Mostrodonato separately charged with making a false statement.

Chris Lynch, defence solicitor for Mr Oโ€™Dwyer, told the court that his client was a 26-year-old student chef and was the father of one child with his partner expecting the coupleโ€™s second baby. Mr Lynch outlined to the court that his client was promised some โ‚ฌ600 from the โ€œenterpriseโ€ and was certainly โ€œnot proudโ€ of the incident. Mr Lynch claimed that his client did not get any money from the theft and was in poor circumstances at the time but that he made full admissions of his part involvement to the gardai when quizzed. Mr Lynch said that his client was making โ€œsomething of his lifeโ€ through his studies and was a โ€œfamily man now going wellโ€.

Tom Kiely, solicitor for Frank Mostrodonato, told the court that his client had the โ€œpolar opposite in his account of eventsโ€, and that on entering a guilty plea to his involvement in the โ€œenterpriseโ€ said that it was โ€œMr Oโ€™Dwyerโ€™s ideaโ€.

Mr Kiely said that his client felt a โ€œmoral obligation to help out his friendโ€ who was โ€œunder a lot of pressureโ€. Mr Kiely added that his client did not โ€œprofitโ€ from the theft and that Mostrodonato, originally from New Jersey, had a good record and was employed for a number of years in the city as a security professional. Mostrodonato, the court heard, had since left his position at the off-licence but had received an offer of employment from a local store who โ€œwere fully aware of Mr Mostrodonatoโ€™s circumstancesโ€.

The court heard that as a result of this incident, Mr Mostrodonato was suffering from depression and had โ€œconsiderable weight lost through the stressโ€ and that the โ€œwhole matter had a profound effectโ€ on him.

Judge Tom Oโ€™Donnell, noting that this was a very serious incident, said that the injured party still had not received โ€œone cent of compensationโ€ from either defendant. He also said that whatever disagreement existed between the accused men as to who the โ€œauthorโ€ of the enterprise was, was immaterial.

โ€œThis was a calculated, dishonest and devious enterprise between the two men with the aim of relieving Fine Wines of the moneyโ€.

Judge Oโ€™Donnell said that this was the first time he had been faced with such a case and gave credit for the fact that the โ€œgardai twigged something wasnโ€™t rightโ€ in the statement of Mr Mostrodonato.

Convicting both men of the theft, Judge Oโ€™Donnell said that โ€œdespite the letters and references brought before the court, this was a cold and calculated theftโ€. He sentenced both men to four months prison and ordered that the committal warrant be executed on May 4. Judge Oโ€™Donnell marked the case proved against Frank Mostrodonato for making a false statement and took it into consideration before adjourning the case.

Advertisement