HSE defend their role in rent supplement scheme

THE HSE has dispelled what they describe as inaccurate claims made by local representatives in the application of their rental supplement scheme.

Superintendent Community Welfare officer Eddie Murphy, has told the Limerick Post that accusations of reckless behaviour regarding the scheme are โ€œunforgivableโ€. He also insisted that the funds for the supplement were drawn from the Social Welfare budget, and not the health budget, as, he said, has been a common misconception.

โ€œWe work under the legislation of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, and everything is governed by thatโ€, added Mr. Murphy.

Advertisement

Sign up for the weekly Limerick Post newsletter


He stated that, although all employees who administer any social welfare payments are staff of the HSE, the rent supplement scheme is operated on an agency basis on behalf of the Department of Social and Family Affairs.

Explaining how the process functions, he said: โ€œWhen someone presents themselves to us, the first thing we do is refer them to the housing officer at the relevant local authority.

โ€œA housing needs assessment is then carried out and their staff will call to the individual and assess their needs. Once the Local Authority establishes a housing need, they send a letter to us confirming this need.

โ€œWe then undertake a means test and will generally establish that the person is receiving social welfare payments, is involved in a social employment scheme, or is working part-time, under 30 hours a weekโ€.

Mr. Murphy confirmed that it is up to the individual to then find a landlord who is willing to rent to them, within the limits of the scheme.

Using the example of a lone parent with more than two children, he explained that accommodation must be found for โ‚ฌ745 per calendar month, or less, under the limits set by the Department of Finance and the Department of Social and Family Affairs.

โ€œThe means test will have established how much the tenant can contribute to the rent themselves. The minimum contribution that must be made is โ‚ฌ24 per week, or โ‚ฌ104 per calendar month. If accommodation was found for โ‚ฌ745 per month, the tenants contribution of โ‚ฌ104 would be subtracted, and he/she would receive a supplement of โ‚ฌ641 per calendar month, or โ‚ฌ148 per week. This is paid by the tenant directly to the landlord, we do not pay it.

โ€œSome social welfare payments are slightly higher than others, so any income above the base line rate must be contributed towards rent on top of the initial โ‚ฌ24 per weekโ€.

The same system applies to a single individual, though they must find accomodation for a maximum of โ‚ฌ446, and also contribute a minimum of โ‚ฌ24 a week to the rent.

Mr. Murphy emphasised that these payments were not coming out of the Health Budget: โ€œWe are tapping into the mainframe social welfare payments computer in Dublin. The funds are not coming out of the health budget in any shape or form. There is a misnomer that the HSE are throwing money away, but these are all Department of Social and Family Affairs cheques, and not from the HSEโ€.

In relation to anti-social behaviour in rented accommodation, Mr. Murphy clarified that his department have no power to intervene, and advised: โ€œThe only people who can be complained to regarding anti-social behaviour is the Gardaiโ€.

He added that under the Data Protection Act, landlords names cannot be released, and that this had been tested as far as the Freedom of Information Act, where it was agreed that names could not be made public.

โ€œCouncillors have also asked why we are not responsible for housing standardsโ€, continued Mr. Murphy, โ€œbut this is not the role of the HSE. We only inspect properties to ensure they meet basic requirements but canโ€™t tell people where to live. We may advise tenants if we feel they are not getting value for money, but ultimately, it is their decision.

โ€œUnder the Housing (Standards for Rented Houses) Regulations 2008, the responsibility rests with the housing authority alone. The only inspection we make is to confirm that the tenant is living where they say they are, and that they continue to do soโ€.

Finally, Mr. Murphy stated that any person who had been receiving rent allowance for over 18 months was supposed to move on to the Local Authority RAS scheme, but that the authorities were way behind because of a lack of resources.

โ€œThey are currently only moving people onto their own housing scheme at a rate of two or three a week. They have the luxury of vetting tenants, checking the the houses and reaching an agreement with the landlords. We donโ€™t have that luxury as those who present to us have a housing emergency.

โ€œWe are obliged to provide rent supplements until the Local Authority take over, providing the tenant continues to meet the income and housing needsโ€.

There are approximately 3,000 claimants being paid rent allowance at present, and Mr. Murphy concludes: โ€œThis supplementary rent allowance is a safety net for those who need financial assistance. Our staff cannot act recklessly and we ask for no more than we are allowed to ask for from tenants, and a tough means test is carried out. We are very conscious that taxpayers money is being spent. Councillors may feel the supplement is too high but rates were reduced by 8% in April, and I expect them to fall again in the next budgetโ€.

Advertisement